Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 175
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Int J Env Health Eng 2016,  5:16

Removal of zinc and nickel from aqueous solution by chitosan and polyaluminum chloride


1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Environmental Technology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan; Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Health Management and Medical Informatics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Web Publication15-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Eng. Nezamaddin Mengelizadeh
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar-Jerib Ave., Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-9183.190642

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aims: The purpose of this study is to investigate the zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) removal from aqueous solution by coagulation-flocculation using polyaluminum chloride (PACl) and chitosan (CS) biopolymer.
Materials and Methods: This study was a laboratory scale experiment, which used PACl and CS to remove Zn and Ni with concentrations 3-100 mg/L from aqueous solutions. Jar test was used to compare the Zn and Ni removal efficiencies of the chemical treatment options using PACl and CS. The dosages used for PACl ranged from 5 to 100 mg/L whereas CS dosages varied between 5 and 75 mg/L.
Results: The results showed that optimum coagulant doses and pH were found at 50-100 mg/L and 11 for PACl and 20-75 mg/L and 11 for CS, respectively, when CS added with PACl led to a better removal efficiency of the metals (more of 99%). In mixed aqueous solution, the presence of Zn caused increase of Ni removal efficiency and the presence of Ni caused decrease of Zn removal efficacy.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that CS had higher removal efficiency than PACl for removal of Zn and Ni, and also CS as a coagulant aid led to increasing in metal removal.

Keywords: Chitosan, coagulation-flocculation, heavy metal, polyaluminum chloride


How to cite this article:
Jaafarzadeh N, Mengelizadeh N, Jalil M, Takdastan A, Alavi N, Niknam N. Removal of zinc and nickel from aqueous solution by chitosan and polyaluminum chloride. Int J Env Health Eng 2016;5:16

How to cite this URL:
Jaafarzadeh N, Mengelizadeh N, Jalil M, Takdastan A, Alavi N, Niknam N. Removal of zinc and nickel from aqueous solution by chitosan and polyaluminum chloride. Int J Env Health Eng [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 May 24];5:16. Available from: https://www.ijehe.org/text.asp?2016/5/1/16/190642


  Introduction Top


The release of large amounts of heavy metals into the natural environment has resulted in a number of ecological and health problems. Many industrial processes such as metal finishing, electroplating, nonferrous metal works, paper, and petroleum produce wastewater flows containing heavy metals which are toxic to nature. Such toxic metals can be presented in the other environments since they are not biodegradable and can be accumulated in living organisms. Some metals, such as zinc (Zn) and iron, are regarded bioessential while others such as cadmium, mercury, and chromium are highly toxic. However, even bioessential metals may cause health and ecological problems if present at a considerable amount. Two metal ions which are often released into nature through industrial activities at concentrations of health and ecological concern are Zn and Ni. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]

Zn is a trace element that is essential for life and acts as a micronutrient when presents in trace amounts. It is important for the physiological functions of living tissue and controls many biochemical processes. However, too large amount of Zn can cause prominent health problems, such as muscular stiffness, loss of appetite, stomach cramps, skin irritations, vomiting, nausea, and anemia. [3],[6],[7] The Ni ion, compared to other heavy metals, is a more rebellious pollutant. The effects of Ni exposure vary from skin irritation to damage to the lungs, nervous system, and mucous membranes as chest pain, tightness of the chest, and dry cough, respectively. [2],[8],[9] Taking according to its health effects and toxicology, occurrence and human exposure, different regulatory agencies have recommended a maximum contaminant level for heavy metal in drinking water, e.g., the current WHO guideline value for Ni (II) and Zn (II) in drinking water is 0.02 and 3 mg/L, respectively. Therefore, the removal of excess Ni and Zn ions from wastewater is essential. [10]

Conventional technologies have been employed for the removal of heavy metal including chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, adsorption, electrolysis, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis. [6],[11],[12],[13],[14] However, these methods require high capital investment as well as creating sludge disposal difficulty. [15] Coagulation is very much the most widely used process to remove the heavy metal in water. [6] Recent studies have indicated that heavy metal in wastewater is removed by coagulation with iron- or aluminum-based coagulant. [16],[17],[18],[19] Coagulation is a kind of physicochemical technique which uses metal oxide or metal hydroxide (ferry, aluminum, and calcium) for destabilizing and collecting colloids or coagulates heavy metal. There are number of different mechanisms involved in a coagulation process, including coherence and enmeshment, adsorption and charge neutralization, interparticle bridging, and sweep coagulation. These mechanisms are very important in forming flocs of heavy metal and suspended solid which could be easily settled and finally removed. The most common coagulants used are aluminum and iron salts, such as aluminum sulfate (generally known as alum) and ferric chloride. [20],[21],[22],[23] More recently, new generation of coagulants-inorganic polymer flocculants (IPFs) due to advantages such as positively charged monomers and polymers, formation of rapid and denser floc, and reduced sludge has been becoming more and more popular. [24],[25] One of the major IPFs, polyaluminum chloride (PACl), is made by fragmentary hydrolysis of acid aluminum chloride solution using a specific reactor and used extensively for water and wastewater treatment. PACl contains different amounts of hydroxyl, and the molecular formula of PACl is [Al m (OH)n(H 2 O)x].Cl 3m−n (n ≤3 m). [26],[27] However, the use of some conventional materials for coagulation and flocculation is frequently discussed due to causes of environmental problems such as aggregation in the food chain, Alzheimer disease, and produce material toxic by-products. [26],[27],[28],[29]

For these reasons, in recent years, there has been considerable interest in the advancement of natural coagulants. [30] Natural coagulants extracted from waste can serve as alternatives to synthetic polyelectrolyte because they are biodegradable, renewable, produce no secondary pollution, cost-effective aspects, are safe for human health, and have a wider effective dosage range for flocculation of colloidal suspension. [29],[31] Among these natural products, chitosan (CS) has received a great amount of attention for the past 20 years for many applications in wastewater treatment. [32]

CS is a linear cationic polymer of D-glucosamine and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine produced by deacetylation of chitin (poly-N-acetyl glucosamine), the second most abundant natural organic resource only next to cellulose on the earth. Chitin and its derivative (CS) are manufactured from the outer shell of crustaceans (such as crabs, shrimps, prawns, and lobsters), fungi, and yeast. CS possesses several intrinsic properties such as its nontoxicity, inexpensive, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and its outstanding chelating behavior that make it an effective coagulant and/or flocculants for the removal of contaminants in the dissolved state. It has characteristics of both coagulants and flocculants, i.e., high cationic charge density, long polymer chains, bridging of aggregates, and precipitation (in neutral or alkaline pH conditions). Furthermore, the physicochemical properties of CS related to the presence of amine and carboxylic functions make it very efficient for coagulation and binding metal cations in alkali and neutral solutions and for interacting with anionic solutes in acidic solutions. [33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38]

The main objective of this study was to investigate Zn and Ni removal by PACl in conjunction with CS from aqueous solutions. The effect of pH, type, and dosage of coagulant on metal removal and effect of amount of coagulant aid on the Zn and Ni were studied.


  Materials and Methods Top


Chemicals and reagents

Analytical grade reagents were used in experimental studies. Chloride salts of test metals (ZnCl 2 and NiCl 2 .6H 2 O from Merck) were used for preparing certain concentrations of synthetic solutions. Polysaccharide CS (CS, 75-85% deacetylation) and PACl were purchased from sigma chemical. Deionized water was used to prepare all stock solutions. The pH adjustments were carried out using 0.1N HCl and 0.1N NaOH. The pH of the solution was measured with a pH meter (827 pH Lab, Metrohm Ltd., Herisau, Switzerland).

The CS was solubilized in a 1% dilute acetic acid solution (Merck) with a 75-85% degree of deacetylation and mixed with a magnetic stirrer at 100 rpm for 30 min to obtain a 1% stock solution. Stock model wastewater solutions of 1000 mg/L Ni or Zn were prepared by dissolving the required amounts of NiCl 2 or ZnCl 2 in deionized water.

Jar test

Chemical coagulation experiments were carried out using a jar testing technique. Jar testing equipment (JLT6 model, VELP Scientifica, Italy) was used for investigating the effects of pH (6-11), coagulant dosage (5-1000 mg/L), and initial metal ion concentration (3-100 mg/L) on removal of Ni and Zn. A volume of 25 mg/L of prepared PACl or CS solution was added to a jar containing 1000 ml of sample. The coagulation experiments proceeded with rapid mixing of wastewater samples at 120 rpm for 1 min, followed by slow mixing at 30 rpm for 20 min. Sedimentation was allowed to occur for 60 min, and residual metal concentrations were measured after filtration of wastewater using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS 5FL model, Thuringia, Germany).


  Results Top


The influence of different pH on Zn and Ni removal efficiency was investigated at a concentration metal of 25 mg/L and the coagulant dosage of 25 mg/L [Figure 1]. From [Figure 1], initial pH had an important effect on the coagulation behavior of the two coagulants. To determine optimum dosage of CS and PACl, experiments were conducted by changing the dosage of coagulants. The results of this part are shown in [Figure 2]. As shown in [Figure 2], optimum doses of CS and PACl for both metals were 100 and 500 mg/L, respectively. Moreover, in this study, the dose of the CS (as coagulant aid) was varied from 2 to 25 mg/L. [Figure 3] presents that combination of PACl and CS at different ratios achieved better removal efficiencies of the metals in the range of 95.32-99.9% for total Zn and 83.2-99.37% for Ni.
Figure 1: Effect of pH on Zn and Ni removal by chemical coagulation (Zn: 25 mg/L, Ni: 25 mg/L, coagulant dose: 25 mg/L, settle time: 1 h). Zn: Zinc; Ni: Nickel

Click here to view
Figure 2: Effect of coagulant dose on metal removal (Zn: 25 mg/L, Ni: 25 mg/L, settle time: 1 h, pH: 11). Zn: Zinc; Ni: Nickel

Click here to view
Figure 3: Effect of coagulant aid dose on metal removal (Zn: 25 mg/L, Ni: 25 mg/L, coagulant dose: 25 mg/L, settle time: 1 h, pH: 11). Zn: Zinc; Ni: Nickel

Click here to view


The effect of initial metal concentration on the removal rate was examined with several solutions containing concentrations from 3 to 100 mg/L of single metals. [Figure 4] shows the change of the residual concentrations of metals with the initial concentration. As expected, it appears that the removal rate was decreased upon increasing initial concentration. Investigation of metal ions interaction shows that in presence of Zn, removal efficacy of Ni apparently increases [Figure 5].
Figure 4: Effect of initial concentration on metal removal (coagulant dose: 25 mg/L, settle time: 1 h, pH: 11). Zn: Zinc; Ni: Nickel

Click here to view
Figure 5: Effect of metal ions interaction on the removal efficiency of metals (pH: 11, coagulant dose: 25 mg/L, aid coagulant: 10 mg/L, settling time: 1 h). Zn: Zinc; Ni: Nickel

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


pH effect

pH is one of the effective parameters on solution characteristics, behavior of biopolymer in solution, metals surface charge, and coagulants during coagulation and flocculation process. In this research, the effect of pH on coagulation and flocculation process of Zn and Ni using CS and PACl is shown in [Figure 1]. According to [Figure 1], metal removal efficiency by PACl and CS is increased when pH increases. The metal removal percentage of 85% and 96% was obtained by PACl and CS, respectively. This increase of metal removal ratio by PACl can be explained on the basis of groups which were formed through PACl hydrolyzes and effect of pH. At pH values lower or equal to 8, PACl is hydrolyzed into Al(OH) 2+ , Al(OH) 2+ , Al 2 (OH) 2 4+ , Al 3 (OH) 45+ , Al(OH) 3 , and Al 13 O 4 (OH) 247+ Al 13 O 4 (OH) 24 (H 2 O) 12 7 groups and the removal ratio for Zn and Ni is very low due to cationic charge of hydrolyzed groups. When pH value increases from 8 to 11, the removal ratio of Zn and Ni is increased through absorption mechanism, which is formed in this pH range by Al(OH) 3 . For CS, increasing Zn and Ni removal efficiency by increasing pH value can be explained according to CS isoelectric point (pH ZC = 6.3). When sample pH is lower than isoelectric point, CS gets positive electric charge because amino groups (−NH3 + ) are protonized so that it can react easily with negative charge compounds such as proteins, anionic polysaccharides, fatty acids, and negative charge metals. At pH values over isoelectric point, CS gets negative electric charge because carboxyl group (COO−) is ionized. Therefore, increase in cationic metal removal percentage (due to pH increase) is related to reduction in cationic sites of amino groups and negative charge increase through ionized carboxyl groups. Researchers in their studies about metal removal through chemical coagulation concluded that as pH rises, the metal removal ratio is increased. [16],[39],[40],[41] Also, Bratskaya et al. in their research found that removal ratio for Ni and Zn using CS derivatives is improved as pH value is increased. [42] Furthermore, obtained results in [Figure 1] show that Zn and Ni removal ratio using PACl (without pH control) is lower when compared to condition that in which pH is controlled. This reduction in metal removal ratio is related to decrease in aquatic solution's alkalinity after adding PACl (as coagulant). Chu reported that pH value of solution and efficiency of removal ratio are decreased as coagulant increased. [43]

Determining coagulant dosage

In this study, the effect of coagulant dosage on Zn and Ni removal ratio was evaluated by changing CS and PACl dosage in constant conditions (pH = 11 and initial concentration for Ni and Zn were equal to 25 mg/L). The effect of coagulant dosage on efficiency of Zn and Ni removal ratio in aquatic solutions is shown in [Figure 2]. From [Figure 2], first, by increasing PACl dosage, Zn and Ni removal ratio is increased and then decreased so that the most removal percentage was obtained about 99% at coagulant dosage equal to 150 and 500 mg/L. This initial increase for Zn and Ni removal ratio can be explained due to adding PACl and increase for Al(OH)3 . However, reduction for Zn and Ni removal percentage at high dosages (500-1000 mg/L) can be described that by increasing coagulant dosage, coagulated metals become stable again, and return to solution. In addition, obtained results in [Figure 2] show that by increasing CS dosage, Zn and Ni removal percentage is increased accordingly, which it is due to diprotonization of amino groups and increasing negative charge because carboxylic group is ionized at optimum pH value. At optimum pH = 11, amino groups' sites (which in diprotonized form) cause to metals attachment through chelate mechanism and carboxylic groups' sites (through ionization) results in charge neutralization and interparticle bridging. In addition, these results can be defined on the basis of charge density. CS has high density comparing other coagulants and metal removal ratio using polymer is increased as charge density of polymer is raised. Pang et al. reported that by increasing PACl dosage, metal removal ratio is increased. [41] Zazouli and Yousefi in their study reported that by increasing ferric chloride, metal removal ratio raises at first but then reduces. They attributed this reduction for removal ratio (in high concentration of ferric chloride) to formation of fine floc and its effect on settling speed and restabilization of metals. [44] Chu concluded in his research that at first, the Pb removal ratio by alum is increased, and then reduces due to pH value reduction. [43] Bratskaya et al. reported in their research that metal removal ratio is increased as CS dosage increases. [42]

Determining effect of chitosan aid coagulant

The effect of CS on Zn and Ni removal ratio was evaluated at constant conditions. Obtained results in [Figure 3] show that Ni and Zn removal ratio is increased as CS dosage (as cocoagulant) increases. This increase may be related to high surface charge and increase anionic charge CS at alkaline pH values. Amuda et al. obtained same results and showed the amount of metals removal increased with increasing natural polymers as cocoagulant. [45]

Determining effect of initial metal concentration and competitive removal

The effect of initial metal concentration on removal ratio was investigated in initial Zn and Ni concentration (3, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mg/L) at stable condition (Zn: 25 mg/L, Ni: 25 mg/L, coagulant dose: 25 mg/L, CS: 10 mg/L, settle time: 1 h, pH: 11). According to the results from [Figure 4], as initial metal concentration increases, Zn and Ni removal ratio from synthetic solution is reduced. This reduction may be related to lack of enough adsorption sites and hydrolyze groups. In other word, the higher initial metal concentration, the more coagulant is needed. In study that conducted by Bojic et al. [3] and Xu et al., [19] it was recognized that by increasing initial metal concentration, metal removal ratio is reduced. They explained this reduction due to decrease of adsorption site, which is related to saturation of adsorption sites by Al(OH)3 .

In the present research, experiments were conducted in optimum conditions to evaluate the metal interaction on competition removal efficiency of Zn and Ni by PACl and CS. In this stage, metal concentrations equal to 5, 10, 15, and 50 mg/L were used. Obtained results showed that by increasing Zn concentration from 5 to 10 mg/L, Ni removal ratio is increased, meanwhile, when Zn concentration was between 15 and 50 mg/L, Ni removal ratio was decreased. This increase may be related to activation of Zn metal surface (as an adsorbent) which helps Ni removal improvement and also reduction of Ni (when Zn concentration increases from 15 to 50 mg/L) may be related to competition of both metals for produced OH (because of pH increase) and also competition about absorption of sites which absorb Al(OH)3 . However, regarding Zn, by increasing Ni concentration, the Zn removal ratio is decreased dramatically. This reduction may be related to competition between two metals for produced OH (because of pH increase) and also competition about absorbent sites. Our results are in agreement with other researchers such as Bojic et al. and Pang et al. [3],[41]

Comparison between efficiency of polyaluminum chloride and chitosan for zinc and nickel removal

Regarding description of determinant factors (pH, coagulant dosage, and settling time) on Zn and Ni removal from aqueous solutions using PACl and CS, our obtained results showed that CS is more effective than PACl for metal removal at laboratory scale. As shown in [Figure 1], CS at pH values equal or less than 9 has the same efficiency for metal removal which PACl has at high pH values. For example, at pH = 9, the Zn removal ratio using CS is equal to 81.8% whereas it is 38.98% if PACl was used at same pH value. Furthermore, this metal removal ratio at pH = 9 by CS is nearly equal to metal removal ratio by PACl at pH = 11. Furthermore, CS has the same high removal efficiency for Zn and Ni (in comparison with PACl) at low dosage (20-40 mg/L) which PACl should be used at higher dosage (100-500 mg/L). Also, this high efficiency at low dosage may be related to high ability of active groups such as amino and carboxyl groups and also little change of pH after addition of CS, meanwhile PACl causes to reduction of solution pH.


  Conclusion Top


In the present study, coagulation and flocculation by PACl and CS to remove Zn and Ni metals from aquatic solutions were evaluated. Obtained results showed that optimum pH in coagulation and flocculation processes for both coagulants were 11. At the beginning, increasing in the amount of coagulants led to increasing in Zn and Ni removal efficiencies but then their efficiencies decreased. The most amounts of Zn and Ni removal with CS and PACl were seen in 100 and 150-500 mg/L, respectively. The results of this study also showed that initial concentration of metal had inverse relation with Zn and Ni removal efficiencies in coagulation and flocculation processes. According to the initial metal concentrations which used in this study, the most amounts of Zn and Ni removal efficiencies in coagulation and flocculation were related to 3, 5, and 10 mg/L of metal and in these concentrations, removal efficiencies were 100%. By increasing in the concentration of CS as a coagulant aid, the amount of Zn and Ni removal efficiencies increased. Moreover, according to the obtained results, concurrent presence of Zn and Ni in aqueous solutions leads to reduction of Zn removal (comparing the situation in which each metal is present solely), because presence of metals in aqueous solutions cause to competition on getting produced OH- and adsorption of metals on Al(OH)3 .

Acknowledgment

We are grateful for the financial support of this project by the Environmental Technology Research Center Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

Financial support and sponsorship

Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Ipek U. Removal of Ni (II) and Zn (II) from an aqueous solution by reverse osmosis. Desalination 2005;174:161-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Alyüz B, Veli S. Kinetics and equilibrium studies for the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins. J Hazard Mater 2009;167:482-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bojic AL, Bojic D, Andjelkovic T. Removal of Cu 2+ and Zn 2+ from model wastewaters by spontaneous reduction-coagulation process in flow conditions. J Hazard Mater 2009;168:813-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Vijaya Y, Popuri SR, Boddu VM, Krishnaiah A. Modified chitosan and calcium alginate biopolymer sorbents for removal of nickel (II) through adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 2008;72:261-71.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lu S, Gibb SW, Cochrane E. Effective removal of zinc ions from aqueous solutions using crab carapace biosorbent. J Hazard Mater 2007;149:208-17.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J Environ Manage 2011;92:407-18.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Kalavathy H, Karthik B, Miranda LR. Removal and recovery of Ni and Zn from aqueous solution using activated carbon from Hevea brasiliensis: Batch and column studies. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2010;78:291-302.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Argun ME. Use of clinoptilolite for the removal of nickel ions from water: Kinetics and thermodynamics. J Hazard Mater 2008;150:587-95.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y. Investigations of nickel (II) removal from aqueous solutions using tea factory waste. J Hazard Mater 2005;127:120-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Kalavathy MH, Miranda LR. Moringa oleifera - A solid phase extractant for the removal of copper, nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 2010;158:188-99.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Akbal F, Camc S. Copper, chromium and nickel removal from metal plating wastewater by electrocoagulation. Desalination 2011;269:214-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Nagy E. Removal of zinc and nickel ions by complexation-membrane filtration process from industrial wastewater. Desalination 2009;240:218-26.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Dean JG, Bosqui FL, Lanouette KH. Removing heavy metals from waste water. Environ Sci Technol 1972;6:518-22.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Meunier N, Drogui P, Montané C, Hausler R, Mercier G, Blais JF. Comparison between electrocoagulation and chemical precipitation for metals removal from acidic soil leachate. J Hazard Mater 2006;137:581-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chong AM, Wong YS, Tam NF. Performance of different microalgal species in removing nickel and zinc from industrial wastewater. Chemosphere 2000;41:251-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Ogunfowokan AO, Durosinmi LM, Oyekunle JA, Ogunkunle OA, Igbafe IT. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters using local alum and other conventional coagulants - A comparative study. J Appl Sci 2007;7:1416-21.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kang M, Kamei T, Magara Y. Comparing polyaluminum chloride and ferric chloride for antimony removal. Water Res 2003;37:4171-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Johnson PD, Girinathannair P, Ohlinger KN, Ritchie S, Teuber L, Kirby J. Enhanced removal of heavy metals in primary treatment using coagulation and flocculation. Water Environ Res 2008;80:472-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Xu Y, Yang L, Yang J. Removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions by two kinds of manganese coagulants. Int J Eng Sci 2010;2:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ebrahimi A, Taheri E, Pashaee A, Mahdavi M. The effectiveness of polyaluminum ferric chloride (PAFCl) for turbidity and color removal from Isfahan raw water. Desalination Water Treat 2014;18:1966-72.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ebrahimi A, Taheri E, Pashaee A, Mahdavi M. Effectiveness of Poly aluminium ferric chloride for turbidity and color removal from low to medium turbid water. Arch Hyg Sci 2014;3:175-83.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ahmad AL, Sumathi S, Hameed BH. Coagulation of residue oil and suspended solid in palm oil mill effluent by chitosan, alum and PAC. Chem Eng J 2006;118:99-105.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Wu X, Ge X, Wang D, Tang H. Distinct mechanisms of particle aggregation induced by alum and PACl: Floc structure and DLVO evaluation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2009;347:56-63.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ye C, Wang D, Shi B, Yu J, Qu J, Edwards M, et al. Alkalinity effect of coagulation with polyaluminum chlorides: Role of electrostatic patch. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2007;294:163-73.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Gao BY, Yue QY, Wang Y. Coagulation performance of polyaluminum silicate chloride (PASiC) for water and wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 2007;56:225-30.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Gao BY, Chu YB, Yue QY, Wang BJ, Wang SG. Characterization and coagulation of a polyaluminum chloride (PAC) coagulant with high Al13 content. J Environ Manage 2005;76:143-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Li F, Jiang JQ, Wu S, Zhang B. Preparation and performance of a high purity poly-aluminum chloride. Chem Eng J 2010;156:64-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Rizzo L, Di Gennaro A, Gallo M, Belgiorno V. Coagulation/chlorination of surface water: A comparison between chitosan and metal salts. Sep Purif Technol 2008;62:79-85.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Szygula A, Guibal E, Ariño Palacín M, Ruiz M, Sastre AM. Removal of an anionic dye (Acid Blue 92) by coagulation-flocculation using chitosan. J Environ Manage 2009;90:2979-86.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Bina B, Mehdinejad MH, Nikaeen M, Attar HM. Effectiveness of chitosan as natural coagulant aid in treating turbid waters. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 2009;6:247-52.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jiang X, Cai K, Zhang J, Shen Y, Wang S, Tian X. Synthesis of a novel water-soluble chitosan derivative for flocculated decolorization. J Hazard Mater 2011;185:1482-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]    
32.
Szygu³a A, Guibal E, Ruiz M, Sastre AM. The removal of sulphonated azo-dyes by coagulation with chitosan. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2008;330:219-26.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Renault F, Sancey B, Badot PM, Crini G. Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes - An eco-friendly approach. Eur Polym J 2009;45:1337-48.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Roussy J, Chastellan P, Van Vooren M, Guibal E. Treatment of ink-containing wastewater by coagulation/flocculation using biopolymers. Water SA 2007;31:369-76.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Guibal E, Roussy J. Coagulation and flocculation of dye-containing solutions using a biopolymer (Chitosan). React Funct Polym 2007;67:33-42.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Chatterjee T, Chatterjee S, Lee DS, Lee MW, Woo SH. Coagulation of soil suspensions containing nonionic or anionic surfactants using chitosan, polyacrylamide, and polyaluminium chloride. Chemosphere 2009;75:1307-14.  Back to cited text no. 36
[PUBMED]    
37.
Guan B, Ni W, Wu Z, Lai Y. Removal of Mn (II) and Zn (II) ions from flue gas desulfurization wastewater with water-soluble chitosan. Sep Purif Technol 2009;65:269-74.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Gamage A, Shahidi F. Use of chitosan for the removal of metal ion contaminants and proteins from water. Food Chem 2007;104:989-96.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Malhbtra S, Kulkarni D, Pande SP. Effectiveness of poly aluminum chloride (PAC) Vis a Vis alum in the removal of fluorides and heavy metals. J Environ Sci Health A 1997;32:2563-74.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Patoczka J, Johnson R, Scheri J. Trace heavy metals removal with ferric chloride. Proceedings of Water Environment Federation Industrial Wastes Technical Conference, Nashville; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Pang FM, Kumar P, Teng TT, Omar AM, Wasewar KL. Removal of lead, zinc and iron by coagulation-flocculation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2011;42:809-15.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Bratskaya SY, Pestov AV, Yatluk YG, Avramenko VA. Heavy metals removal by flocculation/precipitation using N-(2-carboxyethyl) chitosans. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2009;339:140-4.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Chu W. Lead metal removal by recycled alum sludge. Water Res 1999;33:3019-25.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Zazouli MA, Yousefi Z. Removal of heavy metals from solid wastes leachates coagulation-flocculation process. J Appl Sci 2008;8:2142-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Amuda OS, Amoo IA, Ipinmoroti KO, Ajayi OO. Coagulation/flocculation process in the removal of trace metals present in industrial wastewater. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 2006;10:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 45
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Cross-Linked and Functionalized Acrylic Polymers: Efficient and Reusable Sorbents for Zn(II) Ions in Solution
C. Mita,I. Bunea,T. Roman,D. Humelnicu
Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Cycle of Ni(II)-Ni(III)-Ni(II) in Ni-doped Layered Double Hydroxides for Activation of Intercalated Peroxydisulfate
Xin Huang,Xujie Zhou,Shaohong Han,Jizhi Zhou,Guangren Qian,Naiyun Gao
Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019; : 123937
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Studying Ni(II) Adsorption of Magnetite/Graphene Oxide/Chitosan Nanocomposite
Luyen T. Tran,Hoang V. Tran,Thu D. Le,Giang L. Bach,Lam D. Tran
Advances in Polymer Technology. 2019; 2019: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3816    
    Printed211    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded405    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal